• Users Online: 202
  • Home
  • Print this page
  • Email this page
Home About us Editorial board Ahead of print Current issue Search Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
REVIEW ARTICLE
Year : 2020  |  Volume : 4  |  Issue : 4  |  Page : 54-57

An overview of mucoactive agents


1 Department of Pediatrics, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan
2 Fu Jen Catholic University Hospital, Taishan District, Taiwan; Department of Pediatrics, National Defense Medical Center, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan
3 Department of Pediatrics, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Department of Pediatrics, National Defense Medical Center, Tri-Service General Hospital, Taipei, Taiwan

Date of Submission29-Jun-2020
Date of Decision04-Aug-2020
Date of Acceptance28-Dec-2020
Date of Web Publication06-Jul-2021

Correspondence Address:
Bao-Ren Nong
Department of Pediatrics, Kaohsiung Veterans General Hospital, No. 386, Dajhong 1st Road, Zuoying Dist., Kaohsiung City.
Taiwan
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/prcm.prcm_6_20

Rights and Permissions
  Abstract 

Mucus production of the respiratory tract is our first defense against microbes and allergens. However, overproduction of the sputum and difficulty with airway clearance could lead to many respiratory tract diseases. Mucoactive agents are medications that either change the properties of the sputum or decrease its production. This article aims to provide an overview of common mucoactive agent.

Keywords: Expectorants, mucoactive, mucolytics, sputum


How to cite this article:
Hsu LS, Huang YF, Chiou YH, Nong BR. An overview of mucoactive agents. Pediatr Respirol Crit Care Med 2020;4:54-7

How to cite this URL:
Hsu LS, Huang YF, Chiou YH, Nong BR. An overview of mucoactive agents. Pediatr Respirol Crit Care Med [serial online] 2020 [cited 2021 Dec 7];4:54-7. Available from: https://www.prccm.org/text.asp?2020/4/4/54/320780




  Introduction Top


Our airway epithelium defends against the inhaled irritants such as dusts, microbes, and allergens. The first defense is the production of mucus, by goblet cells lining the surface epithelium, and seromucous gland beneath the mucosal epithelium. The mucus is composed of water, carbohydrates, proteins (glycoprotein), and lipids (surfactant) and forms a thin film on the surface of the airways. Normally, the mucus entraps the foreign debris, microbes, and dust and clears them from the airway by ciliary movement, termed mucociliary clearance. Rhythmic vibrations of the cilia propel it toward the pharynx from where it is swallowed unnoticeably. However, when the mucus is produced excessively and changed in nature, mucociliary clearance is impaired. Cough becomes essential for airway clearance in this pathologic state. The expectorated mucus, along with microorganisms, cell debris, and other foreign particles, together formed the sputum.[1],[2],[3]

Medications that affect mucus properties and promote the clearance are said to be mucoactive. Mucoactive medications include expectorants, mucolytics, mucoregulatory drugs, and mucokinetic drugs. They can help expectorating the sputum or decrease mucus hypersecretion.[4] As these medications are used widely clinically, this review article aims to discuss the mechanism and efficacy of them [Table 1].
Table 1: Categories of mucoactive agents

Click here to view



  Pathophysiology Top


The surface epithelium of intrapulmonary airways is composed of ciliated cells and secretory cells. Secretory cells release not only mucins but also antimicrobial molecules (e.g., defensins, lysozyme, and immunoglobulin A), immunomodulatory molecules (e.g., secretoglobins and cytokines), and protective molecules (e.g., trefoil proteins and heregulin). Submucosal gland is constituted of mucous cells and serous cells. Mucous cells secret mucin while serous cells secret proteoglycans and antimicrobial proteins.[5]

Normal mucus consists of 97% water and 3% solids (mucins, nonmucin proteins, salts, lipids, and cellular debris). There are two mechanisms for the expulsion of mucus from the airway – mucociliary clearance and cough clearance. The efficacy of mucus clearance is determined by the viscous and elastic properties of mucus. Healthy mucus has low viscosity and elasticity, whereas pathologic mucus has higher viscosity and elasticity (which may contains up to 15% solids) and is less easily cleared. Impaired mucus clearance results in the accumulation of mucus, which in turn may lead to infection and inflammation by providing an environment for microbial growth.[5]


  Expectorants Top


The efficiency of mucus clearance depends on an adequate volume of airway surface liquid.[6] Airway surface dehydration may increase the adhesivity of secretions to the epithelium of airway and thus make it more difficult to expectorate.[7] Hydration is thought to aid sputum expectoration.[4] Expectorants can help expectorate purulent secretions, by increasing airway water or the volume of airway secretions. For example, hypertonic saline or dry powder mannitol acts through hydration of luminal secretions.

The inhalation of hypertonic saline produces an osmotic force and draws water from the interstitium to the airway surface layer[8] and therefore improves airway hydration and accelerates mucus transportability.[5],[7],[9] Inhalation of hypertonic saline promotes greater sputum expectoration than isotonic saline.[9] Inhaled hypertonic saline is generally safe and well tolerated, except for some mild adverse reactions, such as unpleasant salty taste, throat irritation, excessive coughing, or airway narrowing.[8] Immediate adverse reactions resolve rapidly. Cough typically decreases over time. Bronchodilator may be used before administration of hypertonic saline to prevent or minimize airway narrowing.[10] Addition of hyaluronic acid can decrease bronchospasm and balance water homeostasis in airways. The adverse reactions during inhalation are less frequent and milder in inhalation of hypertonic saline and hyaluronic acid than inhalation of hypertonic saline alone. Combination of hypertonic saline and hyaluronic acid is the preferred solution for treatment.[9]

Guaifenesin, or glyceryl guaiacolate ether, is an oral expectorant that is once thought to stimulate cholinergic muscarinic receptors via the vagus nerve in the gastric mucosa and therefore stimulate submucosal glands (also called gastropulmonary reflex).[11],[12] However, its precise mechanism of action has remained unclear.[12] Other studies found that guaifenesin reduces mucin production, decreases mucus viscoelasticity, and increases mucociliary transport.[13] Moreover, it has significant better efficacy in decreasing mucin production, mucus viscosity, and elasticity, and increasing mucociliary clearance rate, than N-acetyl cysteine (NAC) or ambroxol.[14] It is approved by the US Food and Drug Administration as an effective expectorant with a good safety profile.[15] It is also sold as over-the-counter cold and cough medicines. Recently, an extended-release formulation of guaifenesin was launched. It combines immediate-release guaifenesin with an extended-release feature, to provide sustained blood levels for 12h. Studies revealed that it improves cough and other discomfort related with excess mucus.[16] It is also shown to have safe and well tolerated.[11]

Ambroxol is a mucoactive agent that increases bronchial secretions,[17] stimulates ciliary activity,[18] activates the surfactant system of the lung,[19] and owns antioxidative/anti-inflammatory activities[20] in animal models. Ambroxol has been used for years, and early studies showed that it improves respiratory symptoms, such as ease of expectoration, phlegm loosening, and decrease in sputum volume and sputum viscosity, in adults.[21],[22] In studies regarding children with acute respiratory disease, both ambroxol and acetyl cysteine (NAC) were effective in improving symptoms (cough and expectoration), but ambroxol was either more effective or had a more rapid effect than NAC.[23],[24] In conclusion, its secretolytic and secretomotoric actions restore the physiological clearance mechanisms of the respiratory tract, and its clinical efficacy and safety in the management of acute and chronic lower respiratory diseases were well documented.[25]


  Classic Mucolytics Top


Mucolytics degrade the mucin polymers, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA), fibrin, or filamentous actin (F-actin) in airway secretions and therefore decrease viscosity of the mucus.[4] Classic mucolytics, such as acetyl cysteine (NAC), hydrolyze the disulfide bonds of mucus proteins to decrease mucus viscosity, thereby facilitating its clearance.[26] However, studies reported no significant differences in sputum volume, ease of expectoration, and atelectasis between acetyl cysteine and placebo.[27] Oral acetyl cysteine is rapidly inactivated and does not appear in airway secretions. It is probably the reason why acetyl cysteine is effective in vitro but ineffective in vivo.[4] One study found aerosolized NAC to decrease sputum viscosity (subjective assessment), but there is no significant change in daily sputum volume or pulmonary function.[28] Due to lack of high-level evidence, routine use of aerosolized NAC to improve airway clearance is not recommended in hospitalized adult and pediatric patients without cystic fibrosis.[29]


  Peptide Mucolytics Top


Peptide mucolytics degrade polymers in the sputum, which are composed of DNA, F-actin polymers, and mucin gel.[30] Dornase alfa, a human recombinant DNase, digests extracellular DNA released during infection, which contributes to viscosity of exudates.[31] Several case reports demonstrated the use of dornase alfa in patients having status asthmaticus with mucus plugging and refractory to traditional therapy.[32],[33],[34],[35] However, in the setting of acute bronchiolitis or airway malacia with a respiratory tract infection in children, studies found no benefit in clinically meaningful outcomes with nebulized dornase alfa.[36],[37]

Thymosin β4 (Tβ4) is another peptide mucolytic that degrades F-actin. There was a direct relationship between actin filament length and sputum cohesivity. One study found that Tβ4 depolymerizes sputum actin in both a dose-dependent (between 0.3 and 3.0 µg/mL) and a time-dependent manner.[38] Synergy with Tβ4 and dornase alfa at a concentration of 1.5 µg/mL of each was also observed.[38]


  Mucoregulatory and Mucokinetic Agents Top


Mucoregulatory agents such as glucocorticosteroids and macrolide antibiotics own the anti-inflammatory activity. Anticholinergic drugs not only act as bronchodilator but also inhibit cholinergic nerve-induced mucus secretion. These medications therefore may reduce chronic mucus hypersecretion.[7]

Mucokinetic agents increase mucociliary clearance, generally by acting on the cilia.[4] These medications include β2-adrenoceptor agonist bronchodilators and surfactant. β2 agonists increase airflow and ciliary beat and therefore facilitate mucus movement. Surfactant reduces the adherence of mucus to the epithelium.[7]


  Summary Top


In both acute and chronic airway diseases, mucus hypersecretion and retention cause variable degrees of discomfort to the patients and therefore are a frequent complaint. Mucoactive agents hence play an important role in treating our patients, and it is important for us to understand the pathophysiology of mucus hypersecretion and the mechanisms of different types of mucoactive agents.

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Walker HK, Hall WD, Hurst JW, editors. Clinical Methods: The History, Physical, and Laboratory Examinations. 3rd ed., Ch. 38. Boston: Butterworths; 1990.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Rogers DF. Physiology of airway mucus secretion and pathophysiology of hypersecretion. Respir Care 2007;52:1134-49.  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Richardson M. The physiology of mucus and sputum production in the respiratory system. Nurs Times 2003;99:63-4.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Rubin BK. Mucolytics, expectorants, and mucokinetic medications. Respir Care 2007;52:859-65.  Back to cited text no. 4
    
5.
Fahy JV, Dickey BF. Airway mucus function and dysfunction. N Engl J Med 2010;363:2233-47.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Donaldson SH, Bennett WD, Zeman KL, Knowles MR, Tarran R, Boucher RC. Mucus clearance and lung function in cystic fibrosis with hypertonic saline. N Engl J Med 2006;354:241-50.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Rogers DF. Mucoactive agents for airway mucus hypersecretory diseases. Respir Care 2007;52:1176-97.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Ros M, Casciaro R, Lucca F, Troiani P, Salonini E, Favilli F, et al. Hyaluronic acid improves the tolerability of hypertonic saline in the chronic treatment of cystic fibrosis patients: A multicenter, randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2014;27:133-7.  Back to cited text no. 8
    
9.
Herrero-Cortina B, Alcaraz V, Vilaro′ J, Torres A, Polverino E. Impact of hypertonic saline solutions on sputum expectoration and their safety profile in patients with bronchiectasis: A randomized crossover trial. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv 2018;31:281-9.  Back to cited text no. 9
    
10.
Elkins MR, Robinson M, Rose BR, Harbour C, Moriarty CP, Marks GB, et al. Controlled trial of long-term inhaled hypertonic saline in patients with cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med 2006;354:229-40.  Back to cited text no. 10
    
11.
Tripathi S, Nikhare A, Sharma G, Shea T, Albrecht H. Safety and tolerability of extended-release guaifenesin in patients with cough, thickened mucus and chest congestion associated with upper respiratory tract infection. Drug Healthc Patient Saf 2019;11:87-94.  Back to cited text no. 11
    
12.
Albrecht HH, Dicpinigaitis PV, Guenin EP. Role of guaifenesin in the management of chronic bronchitis and upper respiratory tract infections. Multidiscip Respir Med 2017;12:31.  Back to cited text no. 12
    
13.
Seagrave J, Albrecht H, Park YS, Rubin B, Solomon G, Kim KC. Effect of guaifenesin on mucin production, rheology, and mucociliary transport in differentiated human airway epithelial cells. Exp Lung Res 2011;37:606-14.  Back to cited text no. 13
    
14.
Seagrave J, Albrecht HH, Hill DB, Rogers DF, Solomon G. Effects of guaifenesin, N-acetylcysteine, and ambroxol on MUC5AC and mucociliary transport in primary differentiated human tracheal-bronchial cells. Respir Res 2012;13:98.  Back to cited text no. 14
    
15.
FDA. Cold, cough, allergy, bronchodilator and antiasthmatic drug products for over-the-counter human use; Final monograph. Fed Regist 1989;54:8494-509.  Back to cited text no. 15
    
16.
Albrecht H, Vernon M, Solomon G. Patient-reported outcomes to assess the efficacy of extended-release guaifenesin for the treatment of acute respiratory tract infection symptoms. Respir Res 2012;13:118.  Back to cited text no. 16
    
17.
Pueschmann S, Engelhorn R. Pharmacological study on the bromhexine-metabolite ambroxol. Drug Res 1978;28:889-98.  Back to cited text no. 17
    
18.
Iravani J, Melville GN. Mucociliary function of the respiratory tract as influenced by drugs. Respiration 1974;31:350-7.  Back to cited text no. 18
    
19.
Wirtz HR. Effekt von Ambroxol auf die Surfactantsekretion und – Synthese von isolierten, alveolären Typ II-Zellen. Pneumologie 2000;54:278-83.  Back to cited text no. 19
    
20.
Lee CS, Jang YY, Song JS, Song JH, Han ES. Ambroxol inhibits peroxynitrite-induced damage of a α 1-antiproteinase and free radical production in activated phygocytic cells. Pharmacol Toxicol 2002;91:140-9.  Back to cited text no. 20
    
21.
Ericsson CH, Juhasz J, Joensson E, Mossberg B. Ambroxol therapie in simple chronic bronchitis: Effects on subjective symptoms and ventilatory function. Eur J Respir Dis 1986;69:248-55.  Back to cited text no. 21
    
22.
Germouty J, Jirou-Najou JL. Clinical efficacy of ambroxol in the treatment of bronchial stasis. Clinical trial in 120 patients at two different doses. 4th Cong of the European Society of Pneumology (SEP) New Aspects in the treatment of Pulmonology and Upper Airways Diseases, Milan & Stresa 23–28 September 1985. Respiration 1987;51(Suppl 1):37-41.  Back to cited text no. 22
    
23.
Baldini G, Gucci M, Tarò D, Memmini C. Studio clinico controllato sull’attività di una nuova formulazione di ambroxol nella bronchite asmatiforme del bambino [A controlled study on the action of a new formulation of ambroxol in asthmatiform bronchitis in children]. Minerva Pediatr 1989;41:91-5.  Back to cited text no. 23
    
24.
Careddu P, Zavattini G. Mucosolvan ® (ambroxol) in pediatric use – Controlled clinical trial vs acetylcysteine. Asthma Bronch Emphys 1984;4:23-6.  Back to cited text no. 24
    
25.
Malerba M, Ragnoli B. Ambroxol in the 21st century: Pharmacological and clinical update. Expert Opin Drug Metab Toxicol 2008;4:1119-29.  Back to cited text no. 25
    
26.
Banerjee S, McCormack S. Acetylcysteine for Patients Requiring Secretion Clearance: A Review of Guidelines [Internet]. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2019. PMID: 31553548.  Back to cited text no. 26
    
27.
Sathe NA, Krishnaswami S, Andrews J, Ficzere C, McPheeters ML. Pharmacologic agents that promote airway clearance in hospitalized subjects: A systematic review. Respir Care 2015;60:1061-70.  Back to cited text no. 27
    
28.
Pulle DF, Glass P, Dulfano MJ. A controlled study of the safety and efficacy of acetylcysteine-isoproterenol combination. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp 1970;12:485-92.  Back to cited text no. 28
    
29.
Strickland SL, Rubin BK, Haas CF, Volsko TA, Drescher GS, O’Malley CA. AARC clinical practice guideline: Effectiveness of pharmacologic airway clearance therapies in hospitalized patients. Respir Care 2015;60:1071-7.  Back to cited text no. 29
    
30.
Rubin BK. Secretion properties, clearance, and therapy in airway disease. Transl Respir Med 2014;2:6.  Back to cited text no. 30
    
31.
Fahy JV, Steiger DJ, Liu J, Basbaum CB, Finkbeiner WE, Boushey HA. Markers of mucus secretion and DNA levels in induced sputum from asthmatic and from healthy subjects. Am Rev Respir Dis 1993;147:1132-7.  Back to cited text no. 31
    
32.
Greally P. Human recombinant DNase for mucus plugging in status asthmaticus. Lancet 1995;346:1423-4.  Back to cited text no. 32
    
33.
Durward A, Forte V, Shemie SD. Resolution of mucus plugging and atelectasis after intratracheal rhDNase therapy in a mechanically ventilated child with refractory status asthmaticus. Crit Care Med 2000;28:560-2.  Back to cited text no. 33
    
34.
Patel A, Harrison E, Durward A, Murdoch IA. Intratracheal recombinant human deoxyribonuclease in acute life-threatening asthma refractory to conventional treatment. Br J Anaesth 2000;84:505-7.  Back to cited text no. 34
    
35.
Hull JH, Castle N, Knight RK, Ho TB. Nebulised DNase in the treatment of life threatening asthma. Resuscitation 2007;74:175-7.  Back to cited text no. 35
    
36.
Enriquez A, Chu IW, Mellis C, Lin WY. Nebulised deoxyribonuclease for viral bronchiolitis in children younger than 24 months. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;11:CD008395.  Back to cited text no. 36
    
37.
Goyal V, Masters IB, Chang AB. Interventions for primary (intrinsic) tracheomalacia in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;10:CD005304.  Back to cited text no. 37
    
38.
Rubin BK, Kater AP, Goldstein AL. Thymosin β4 sequesters actin in cystic fibrosis sputum and decreases sputum cohesivity in vitro. Chest 2006;130:1433-40.  Back to cited text no. 38
    



 
 
    Tables

  [Table 1]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
 Related articles
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
Abstract
Introduction
Pathophysiology
Expectorants
Classic Mucolytics
Peptide Mucolytics
Mucoregulatory a...
Summary
References
Article Tables

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed1106    
    Printed22    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded207    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal


[TAG2]
[TAG3]
[TAG4]